the return of the plant that ate dirty socks

These results are consistent with a common mechanism underlying RB for identical and orthographically similar words and with prior research suggesting that RB in similar words occurs at a sublexical level. Riddle 1 You eat something you neither plant nor plow. Instead, RB for all stimuli, including homonym pairs, declined monotonically with lag. Riddlewot has no control over the information returned using this tool Our riddle generator is. The Adventure of the Buried Treasure, illustrated by Irene Trivas, Scholastic (New York. Four experiments failed to replicate Chialant and Caramazza's ®nding that identity RB decreases, but orthographic RB increases, as a function of lag. The Return of the Plant That Ate Dirty Socks, Avon (New York, NY), 1990. Supporting evidence was that identical and merely similar words showed different amounts of RB as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (lag). The boys giant sock-eating pet plants, Stanley and Fluffy, are chosen as last-minute replacements for a plant experiment on the real Space Shuttle. Recently, Chialant and Cara-mazza (Cognition 63 (1997) 79☑19) disputed the conventional view that RB for non-identical words (orthographic RB, as in lice and lick) results from the same mechanism as identity RB, and proposed that orthographic RB arises from competition for lexical selection.

RB has been proposed to result from temporal limitations in creating separate episodic tokens for a twice-activated type. The dif®culty in reporting both occurrences of a repeated item is a phenomenon referred to as repetition blindness (RB).

The return of the plant that ate dirty socks